DUMB DECISION BY CANADIAN JUDGE Ken Parese PoTown firstname.lastname@example.org
It's very tempting to come up with a "knee-jerk" reaction...but yes, r.s. argues very well; there's only one controversy in the argument:
"The guy on trial was not the guy who grabbed the money"...that was unclear and not proven...and therefore not as definitive as it is made to appear.
There's still something very wrong! Don't go outside, don't go shopping and learn lethal defense if you have to do either. There are some stronger measures....but that would be even more controversial!
KP in PK
Staten Island WebŪ Forums Index.